Yes on Prop. 40: Retain changes in redistricting
By The Bakersfield Californian
Proposition 40 hasn't generated as much smoke as other initiatives on the Nov. 6 ballot, and with good reason: Its original backers have thrown in the towel. They're no longer campaigning. So why are we bothering to endorse it? Two reasons: Prop. 40 remains on the ballot nonetheless, and, because it's classified as a veto referendum, voters' choices may seem counterintuitive. Yes essentially means no and no means yes. Here's all you need to know: Vote yes.
The ballot measure asks voters to repeal California's new state Senate districts, which were drawn up by the Citizens Redistricting Commission. Republicans had hoped getting this referendum on the ballot would prevent the new Senate lines from being implemented in this year's election. However, the Supreme Court upheld the new maps and Republicans have since abandoned the measure. But it's too late to remove Prop. 40 from the ballot.
Therefore, to keep the maps in place, voters must vote yes. That shouldn't be a tough case to make: Voters have spoken on this issue not once but twice, passing Prop. 11 in 2008, which created the citizens commission, and Prop. 20 in 2010, which expanded the commission's purview beyond state Senate and Assembly districts to include Congress.
Voting districts were previously drawn by state lawmakers themselves, often in contorted fashion to ensure that their districts were safe. The new system transforms the drawing of boundaries into a public process overseen by a bipartisan group of citizens, not by politicians huddled behind closed doors.
To ensure these important reforms remain intact, vote yes on Proposition 40.






Most CommentedMost Popular
About two dozen protesters stood in front of Kern County Superior Court next to the Liberty Bell Thursday morning to make a statement about police brutality.
The death of a man in custody following a prolonged struggle with Kern County Sheriff's deputies and CHP officers and the subsequent fracas over confiscated witness cellphones have gained international attention and raised concerns here that the incidents could tarnish the county's emerging...
Sheriff’s investigators served a search warrant on Kern Medical Center and the Mary K. Shell Mental Health Center seeking medical records to find possible reasons for David Sal Silva’s behavior prior to and during his encounter with law enforcement, The Californian learned Friday.
The Kern County Sheriff's Office is out of control. That's one conclusion many people will draw based on the events of the past two weeks and in the context of recent years.
Blood stains are still visible on the sidewalk at the corner of Flower Street and Palm Drive, where a Bakersfield man struggled with as many as nine officers and later died this week.
Responding to what he called a case that “has consumed the media and our community,” Kern County Sheriff Donny Youngblood said Tuesday he has asked the FBI to conduct a “parallel” investigation into the death of Bakersfield father of four David Sal Silva, who died May 8 after he was beaten by deputies.
Classes were canceled at Bakersfield High School Monday after three small bottle bomb explosions struck campus, authorities said.
Two cellphones confiscated last week from witnesses to the in-custody death of David Sal Silva were returned Wednesday to the attorney representing the witnesses.