Letters to the Editor

Thursday, Apr 25 2013 11:00 PM

Cyclists' licenses? Bad idea

By The Bakersfield Californian

In response to the recent letter writers who think that cyclists should be required to have operators' licenses: First, I hope they realize there's a difference between a "cyclist" and some teenager on a BMX carelessly crossing an intersection. "Cyclists," like myself, use the street the way a car uses the street and most of us do our best to keep from getting hit. I have to admit I've never been to Santa Cruz, but in all the years I've lived in Orange County, L.A. and Bakersfield, I've continued to observe a "Please don't hit me" attitude among cyclists.

Seriously, how much damage are we gonna do? It's not a 2,000-pound vehicle barreling down the street at 60 mph. If we get hit, we're the ones that get hurt. If people are worried that one of us might put a dent in one's Mercedes or get blood on one's windshield, slow down a bit and pay attention.

Second, the agency that would have to be created (by the government ) to govern such licensing would be costly. More government control and something else to spend our taxes on is not a good idea.

Most cyclists also own cars and pay the same fees and taxes as noncyclists. A lot of us ride bikes because we want to. Not because we don't have cars.

In conclusion, try getting on a bicycle and joining us "self-styled" and "privileged" people, as one writer called us, for this "free lunch" we're all having. You might enjoy the exercise.

Paul Blakely

Bakersfield

Bakersfield.com Daily Deal!

Manuel's Casa De Mariscos

Daily Deal

$20 worth of Mexican food for $10

Value
$20
% Off
50%
You Save
$10
0 Bought
Buy Now! See more deals