MANUEL FUDERANAN: Is it time for local government to address PG&E concerns?
There seems to be some inequity on the tiered system of rates that Pacific Gas and Electric has seemingly adopted in calculating monthly charges to its customers. Already, it has been alleged that the electric and gas rates in the Bay Area and its environs are less than what Kern County residents pay. In effect, we may have been subsidizing Bay Area residents for their energy consumption. Bakersfield is a baker's oven in the summer when triple-digit temperatures elevate most households' electric bills to record levels. When the price of one's energy requirement in a month's time is a quarter or more of his or her monthly income, then something is not quite right.
I have learned that some variables influence the assignment of different rates to different households. I don't begrudge PG&E for being philanthropic to some residents with fixed, marginal incomes. Some of them, certainly, deserve some break in their lives. But other reasons for discounted rates defy logic and challenge one's thought process. For one, being a certified asthmatic could be a blessing in disguise. This I have learned recently. It qualifies one for a slashed rate that cushions the impact of his energy needs. The cold air presumably alleviates one's breathing and should be subsidized -- hence, the discount.
I have a friend who claims to be asthmatic. She has a very comfortable income and from all indications doesn't need the subsidy. Because of her "mah-jongg sessions" (a Chinese card game), her house is lighted like a merchant ship and her air conditioner is always at full blast. Yet her monthly PG&E bill approximates mine because of the "asthmatic discount." Meanwhile, it is only me and my wife and my house is as dark as midnight with only a solitary light for the outside of the house. This is how I try to conserve energy. But my electric bill compared to my friend's is a form of "injustice" that I have to bear every month. Thousands of other uninformed residents are unknowingly subsidizing other people's energy usage.
The introduction of SmartMeters has not helped. They only exacerbated the situation and created numerous problems and inconveniences for the users. I remember visiting the local PG&E office to seek clarification on my "jacked-up" electric bill after the SmartMeter was introduced. What the lady at the counter did was typical of a bureaucracy. She just handed me a form to fill out if I wanted to apply for a discount.
I don't know if location has something to do with my PG&E bill. I used to live in a "below-average" neighborhood until some months ago. Because the neighborhood was not so good, I kept three outside lights on the whole night to ward off the denizens of the dark. I also kept my master bedroom TV on all night just to create a semblance of activity. I turned on the air conditioner when needed. My monthly electric bill then was way below what I am paying now in my new house in an "above-average" neighborhood, where I burn only a solitary electric bulb at night.
In other countries, vital utility companies like power and water are partially or fully controlled or regulated by local governments or some national agency. At best, they are quasi-government corporations. They still operate for a minimal profit, if they are run by a private enterprise, but they are regulated. Their expenses for capital improvements are not automatically passed on to consumers. Rate or fee increases are monitored by a government agency -- and there is a uniform schedule of fees, no "forced charity" on consumers. Nobody subsidizes anybody. It is an irony considering that socialism or redistribution of wealth is expected in such a political and social environment.
Bakersfield's citizens, in contrast, are in the grip of utility companies like PG&E. People in government or the private sector who might have the clout or wherewithal seem timid against these utility companies. It's time local government authorities revisit the idea of assuming partial or full control of utility companies' operations. It could be vital to our community's health and growth.
Manuel D. Fuderanan is an engineer with the city of Bakersfield. Community Voices is an expanded commentary of 650 to 700 words.






Most CommentedMost Popular
Responding to what he called a case that “has consumed the media and our community,” Kern County Sheriff Donny Youngblood said Tuesday he has asked the FBI to conduct a “parallel” investigation into the death of Bakersfield father of four David Sal Silva, who died May 8 after he was beaten by...
Two cellphones confiscated last week from witnesses to the in-custody death of David Sal Silva were returned Wednesday to the attorney representing the witnesses.
About two dozen protesters stood in front of Kern County Superior Court next to the Liberty Bell Thursday morning to make a statement about police brutality.
The death of a man in custody following a prolonged struggle with Kern County Sheriff's deputies and CHP officers and the subsequent fracas over confiscated witness cellphones have gained international attention and raised concerns here that the incidents could tarnish the county's emerging...
Blood stains are still visible on the sidewalk at the corner of Flower Street and Palm Drive, where a Bakersfield man struggled with as many as nine officers and later died this week.
Responding to what he called a case that “has consumed the media and our community,” Kern County Sheriff Donny Youngblood said Tuesday he has asked the FBI to conduct a “parallel” investigation into the death of Bakersfield father of four David Sal Silva, who died May 8 after he was beaten by deputies.
A war of words erupted Friday over video footage taken of David Sal Silva’s deadly encounter with law enforcement officers.
Bakersfield College will vacate its 2012 state football championship and forfeit its regular-season wins from the 2011 and 2012 seasons because of California Community College Athletic Association rules violations.