By The Bakersfield Californian
Do you really want cleaner air? Really and truly? Then make your dang coffee at home and take it to work! In case you haven't heard we are under an AIR ALERT.
The weather is so hot, stagnant and downright crappy that there's nothing more businesses can do (short of shutting down) to reduce emissions.
Lois Henry hosts Californian Radio every Wednesday on KERN 1180 AM from 9 to 10 a.m. You can get your two cents in by calling 842-KERN.
That means it's up to us, the car-addicted public, to do something.
And here's the huge sacrifice the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District is asking of us -- avoid drive-thrus.
That got me thinking. (Yeah, I know, watch yer eye!)
If we're all so hep-ho for clean air, why not just ban drive-thrus?
Ban them all.
Fast food joints, ATMs, coffee shops, pharmacies, oh, and the daily kid drop off/pick-up at schools.
And I mean permanently, not just during bad air alerts.
Idling vehicles at valley fast food places alone produce as many nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions on a daily basis as are put out by a major power plant, according to conservative estimates by the air district.
That's about 100 pounds of NOx per day.
Making folks walk 15 yards to go inside for their double bacon cheeseburgers would add up to a major annual emissions reduction. (Not to mention the possible impact on our obesity epidemic, but that's another story.)
And that's just one drive-thru source.
Imagine the emissions reductions from banning school drop off/pick-ups.
"School idling is a huge problem," Seyed Sadredin, director of the air district, agreed. "That's also been a part of our air alert message. Still, everyone shows up 20 minutes early to pick up their kids. And in the mornings, there's always a big jam at schools."
I'll bet almost every single parent waiting in those idling vehicles to pick up Johnny or Suzy would tell you air pollution is a huge concern for them.
Well, perhaps it's time those parents put their exhaust where their mouth is.
I'm sure the air district could find a way to "encourage" cities and counties to restripe school zones to disallow vehicles from lining up on streets in front of schools. Or encourage schools to ban all but buses and emergency vehicles from parking lots.
Maybe schools could even appoint kids to be "idle monitors" and write down license plate numbers of scofflaw parents. (Which, of course, would go on their permanent records.)
Anyhoo, the air district already employs somewhat similar tactics with developers through its "indirect source rule." That rule incentivizes more compact, walkable communities by charging developers mitigation fees up the wazoo if they don't go compact and walkable.
The district could "incentivize" fast food and coffee drive-thrus the same way.
Sadredin told me that parking and restarting a car produces more emissions than an idling car, if the idle time is 90 seconds or less.
So, if fast food places can keep their drive-thru idle times at 90 seconds or less, they're good to go. Otherwise, they would have to pay a mitigation fee or shut down their drive-thrus.
Customers would love the quick service and the air district wouldn't be restricting local commerce, which it's prohibited from doing, according to Sadredin.
Win, win all around, right?
Of course businesses would balk at such a rule.
But the ones who would really scream bloody murder are the consumers. We everyday folks who sit behind the wheel at traffic lights and frown when we can't see the mountains wondering why the air district can't do something about our dirty air.
"It's always easier to point the finger," Sadredin agreed.
We want clean air, yes. But don't inconvenience us for it.
"We've put a lot of tough rules on businesses that cost hundreds of millions of dollars and that's not been easy," he said. "But it hasn't come close to how difficult it is to get the public to look in the mirror."
Sadredin thought people might run over the air district's building when the fireplace rule was first instituted.
For the record, he said the air district has looked at drive-thrus in its quest to try to meet the ever more unattainable air standards set out by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Businesses have been regulated to the gnat's behind and our air is vastly cleaner for it. At this point, though, more regulation on businesses would come at an astronomical cost for relatively small emissions reductions, Sadredin said.
New, stricter standards are forcing the air district to look for emissions under every rock, including drive-thrus.
"We've talked about it a few times," Sadredin said of regulating drive-thrus. "But we would just get laughed out of town."
Aside from the anticipated negative reaction, he said he wasn't sure of the air district's legal authority to ban or control drive-thrus.
There, now. You can all relax. Your afternoon drive-up taco fix isn't going away any time soon.
But we are still under an air alert through today.
That means the district is trying to avoid another $29 million fine -- which we all pay, by the way -- by not having another ozone exceedance.
So, please, for now at least, turn off the engine and go inside.
Opinions expressed in this column are those of Lois Henry, not The Bakersfield Californian. Her column appears Wednesdays and Sundays. Comment at http://www.bakersfield.com, call her at 395-7373 or e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org.