PAUL TRENT: 'Bring Your Own Device' programs have hidden costs
BY PAUL TRENT Contributing columnist
The wrappings have hardly fallen off all the electronic devices gifted this holiday season. Retailers reported tablets and smart phones were at the top of many people's "wish lists."
And now IT staffs are being swamped by employee requests to hook up to company computer networks. This is part of a skyrocketing trend called BYOD -- bring your own device -- to work.
The benefits to companies and employees alike are obvious. Companies save money by avoiding investment in new technology. Employees enjoy the flexibility of using mobile devices of their own choice.
But the pitfalls may not be all that obvious.
Before a company implements a BYOD program, advantages and challenges must be assessed and clear, written policies must be established.
There is no "one size fits all" policy that can be applied. A BYOD policy must be developed to fit a company's specific needs. Just a few issues to consider include:
Equity -- Don't assume all employees are tech-savvy or rich enough to afford to buy their own top-of-line electronics. Will a BYOD program give unwarranted advantages to some employees? How will the "playing field" be leveled?
Overtime -- When an employee is always "connected" to a job through mobile devices, the temptation may be to work beyond normal shifts, exposing companies to labor law complaints.
Productivity -- Will a device or an app make an employee more productive, or be a "distraction?"
Support -- How much and what type of IT support will the company provide? If a device requires repair, who will do the work and pay the cost?
Device types -- What types of devices will be allowed? Will only certain brands be allowed?
Content -- What type of company information can be downloaded to a mobile device? Who owns this "intellectual property?"
Privacy -- Will the company have access to all content stored on the device? Particularly with smart phones, a wide range of personal information -- from location tracking to personal communications -- will be stored along with the company's information. Can the company demand to inspect device's contents?
Security -- What happens if a device is lost or stolen? Will employees be required to "password protect" their mobile devices? Will passwords be shared with the company? Will systems be in place that will allow the company to remotely "wipe," or completely remove content, when a device goes missing?
Termination -- What happens to company information on a mobile device if an employee is fired or resigns? Will it -- and all other information, including contacts and personal photographs -- be "remotely wiped?"
An employee's use of his or her personal technology may appear to be a money-saver for a company. But a BYOD program that is hastily or thoughtlessly implemented can have costly consequences. A BYOD policy should be developed by a company working with employees, as well as staff and consultants in several specialties, including IT, human relations, law and security.
-- Paul Trent is president of Bakersfield-based Trent Systems, an information technology consulting firm. He can be contacted through his website www.trentsystems.net. These are his opinions, not necessarily those of The Californian.






Most CommentedMost Popular
Responding to what he called a case that “has consumed the media and our community,” Kern County Sheriff Donny Youngblood said Tuesday he has asked the FBI to conduct a “parallel” investigation into the death of Bakersfield father of four David Sal Silva, who died May 8 after he was beaten by...
Two cellphones confiscated last week from witnesses to the in-custody death of David Sal Silva were returned Wednesday to the attorney representing the witnesses.
About two dozen protesters stood in front of Kern County Superior Court next to the Liberty Bell Thursday morning to make a statement about police brutality.
The death of a man in custody following a prolonged struggle with Kern County Sheriff's deputies and CHP officers and the subsequent fracas over confiscated witness cellphones have gained international attention and raised concerns here that the incidents could tarnish the county's emerging...
Blood stains are still visible on the sidewalk at the corner of Flower Street and Palm Drive, where a Bakersfield man struggled with as many as nine officers and later died this week.
A war of words erupted Friday over video footage taken of David Sal Silva’s deadly encounter with law enforcement officers.
Responding to what he called a case that “has consumed the media and our community,” Kern County Sheriff Donny Youngblood said Tuesday he has asked the FBI to conduct a “parallel” investigation into the death of Bakersfield father of four David Sal Silva, who died May 8 after he was beaten by deputies.
The death of Bakersfield father of four David Sal Silva immediately following his apparent beating Wednesday by Kern County law enforcement officers raises questions that have been asked in Bakersfield many times before -- questions about the use of deadly force by police.